There's been some talk over the years about Tom Brady and Bill Belichick after losing their last two appearances. That makes them 3-2 in the big game. I think a lot of that talk is ill informed. Let's look at the modern Pats SB results
|2001||beat St. Louis 20-17|
|2003||beat Carolina 32-29|
|2004||beat Philadelphia 24-21|
|2007||lost New York Giants 17-14|
|2011||lost New York Giants 21-17|
Well the first thing you notice is how close the games were. Looking at the final scores they could all pretty much be described as toss ups. Now going 3-2 in "coin flips" is a pretty standard result. This table is the coin flips results.
hmmm so 3-2 is just about right. that might also help explain the Tom Landry Cowboys going 2-3 in the Super Bowl.
Another way to look at it is in terms of expectation. To do this we have to estimate the chance going into the game that the Patriots would win. In 2001 against the greatest show on turf Rams team they were an underdog. In 2007 coming in 18-0 they were a strong team and the favorite. Now there's some subjective guesswork in estimating their chances going into each game but here goes
|Year||Pregame Chance of Winning|
add them together and it comes to 2.80 expected wins. so again 3-2 is just about right